Over
the past 45 years, the US population has increased by 100,000,000 people. Over
the next 40 years, our population is expected to increase by 120,000,000.
With
land being a limited resource, where will all of the people live? How will they
live?
We
must reflect first on land as the key to answering these questions.
In
most markets, “all” of the good land* is gone. So now what?
*
Good land in my definition is land void of regulatory constraints. It may have
physical constraints and land form characteristics which makes development
difficult but we find ways to resolve these issues. We are however allowing
government to restrict the use of land through regulation.
The
land area is used for a variety of uses. But let’s begin with the fact that the
Federal and State governments own about 39% of the land in the United States.
The
Departments within the Federal government include:
Department
of Agriculture i.e. National ForestsDepartment of Defense i.e. Military Bases
Department of the Interior i.e. National Parks
Department of Justice i.e. Prisons
Department of State i.e. International boundary between the US and Mexico
Department of Transportation i.e. FAA
About
60% of the land is privately owned; 1% foreign ownership
The
U.S. land area totals nearly 2.3 billion acres. Land cover in 2001 included:
Source:
Multi-Resolution
Land Characterization (MRLC) consortium (a group of federal agencies)
Percentage
Water 5.2%
Perennial Ice
snow 0.02
Low Intensity residential 3.2
High Intensity residential 1.39
Commercial/Industrial/transportation 0.54
Developed high intensity 0.19
Bare
rock/sand/clay 1.19
Deciduous
Forest 11.05
Evergreen
Forest 12.11
Mixed forest 2.12
Shrub/scrub 21.24
Grasslands 14.31
Pasture/Hay 6.8
Row Crops 15.54
Woody wetlands 3.88
Emergent
Herbaceous wetlands 1.24
Today, do you
have the impression that we are running out of land for real estate development
projects serving the population? If you do; you are wrong. We have plenty of
land but government is slowly removing land from real estate use.
The changes from
decade to decade:
1970’s - no problem finding land in urban, rural or
suburban locations at reasonable prices and with reasonable land owners because
government oversight is only beginning. Reston, Columbia and Irvine Ranch
started the planned community approach and branching away from Levittown which
moved the homeowner to the suburbs but left the commercial/retail/office in the
city.
During
the 70’s, the biggest problem was sewage treatment plants and the moratoriums
established by government until the Clean Water Act amendments passed.
The
most important due diligence issue was the availability of public water and
sewer.
The Federal Water
Pollution Control Act of 1948 was the first major U.S. law to address water
pollution. Growing public awareness and concern for controlling water pollution
led to sweeping amendments in 1972. As amended in 1972, the law became commonly
known as the Clean Water Act (CWA).
The 1972 amendments:
· Established the basic structure for regulating
pollutants discharges into the waters of the United States.
· Gave EPA the authority to implement pollution
control programs such as setting wastewater standards for industry.
· Maintained existing requirements to set water
quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters.
· Made it unlawful for any person to discharge
any pollutant from a point source into navigable waters, unless a permit was
obtained under its provisions.
· Funded the construction of sewage treatment
plants under the construction grants program.
· Recognized the need for planning to address
the critical problems posed by nonpoint source pollution.
Each of the above
amendments changed our real estate development patterns.
The motto for builders
was “Where will our Children Live” – the home builders piled 2 x 4’s on the
corner of 15th & M Streets NW Washington DC with the slogan.
Also because of the wastewater treatment plant issue, there was a movement to
find alternative sewer solutions which led to a concentration on private
systems. This opened up more land for development since home buyers had limited
choices in some markets.
As you know, I follow
new housing starts as my guide to assess the health of the economy. As each
decade unfolds, the economy ebbed and flowed. However, to give you a benchmark,
in the 70’s, we were in a recession, however, at the peak:
Prime Rate 12%
SF Housing Starts 888,100
US Population 213,300,000
Home Ownership Rate 64.4%
1980’s - not much changed in land at the beginning of the decade. We
were in another recession with and suffering from “stagflation”. Regulations
were only ramping up and with 18% interest rates, building homes became
problematic. The recession in the early 80’s was the worst for home building
and real estate development until NOW.
As the Regan administration changed course,
we started to see the home building industry blossom more from a cottage
industry to regional and national builder presence – more than any previous
decade. Land availability and restricting the use of land were not an issue.
Prime Rate 20.50%
SF Housing Starts 705,400
US Population 229,500,000
Home Ownership Rate 63.9%
The industry started
to see product changes i.e. zero lot line housing, small lot single family
detached homes but land availability was not an issue. However, the
implementation of the Clean Water Act amendments started to infiltrate into
local jurisdictions through government regulations. The expansion of wastewater
treatment plants and the extension of sewer trunk lines opened up areas in and
around most major markets.
In the early 80’s, the
housing market was at a virtual standstill but as the decade progressed and the
housing market started to heat up.
Another major component in developing land is
access. The authorization of the Interstate Highway System in 1956 opened up locations
otherwise bypassed. It took awhile to achieve results. It was not until 1974
did the first state complete their interstate highway system. In the ‘80’s, the
funding for interstate highway construction was close to a trillion dollars
setting the stage for developing land
Unfortunately, as the housing market
started to gain traction, the financial meltdown of the Savings & Loan
industry was setting the stage for another recession.
1990’s – the era of regulation!
Early in Decade End of Decade
Prime Rate 10.00% 4.75%
SF Housing Starts 840,000 1,300,000
US Population 253,000,000 288,000,000
Home Ownership Rate 63.9% 67.5%
It was clear at the
beginning of the 90’s, the economy was in a serious recession but by the end of
the decade, real estate development was at full throttle. I will talk more
about the regulatory change in a subsequent blog post but during the decade, there
were three national policies that significantly affected our industry for years
to come…….and still are!
1. The Urban Homestead initiative is part of the
National Homeownership Strategy launched by President Clinton in 1995. The
strategy brings all levels of government, the housing industry, lenders and
non-profit groups together to increase the national homeownership rate.
2. The President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) was established by President Clinton in June 1993 to advise him on sustainable development and develop "bold, new approaches to achieve our economic, environmental, and equity goals."
2. The President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) was established by President Clinton in June 1993 to advise him on sustainable development and develop "bold, new approaches to achieve our economic, environmental, and equity goals."
3. The United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development (UNCED), also called the Earth Summit, took place
in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in June 1992. Agenda 21 addresses the critical
issues we face as a global community: continuing damage to ecosystems, the
worsening of poverty, hunger and ill health, increasing world population and
illiteracy. Agenda 21 is composed of 40 chapters that identify each challenge
and propose simple realistic solutions towards sustainable development.
The
Savings and Loan disaster was handled by the Resolution Trust Corporation in
disposing of land assets held by S & L’s. From the perspective on Main
Street, this approach worked well.
With the population increasing exponentially and with the policy to increase
homeownership, the real estate industry started to gain traction. The baby
boomers were also in full force during the ‘90’s buying homes, changing jobs to
climb the corporate ladder, moving from location to location and expanding our
non-residential real estate needs. Everything was good as we entered into the
new millennium.
2000 –
2010 – we
started the decade with optimism but
everything changed on September 11, 2001. The country stopped. We entered a
sharp but brief recession. Housing hesitated
but continued to thrive.
Year Single Family
Housing Starts
2000 1,230,900
2001 1,273,300
2002 1,358,600
2003 1,499,000
2004 1,610,500
2005 1,715,800 (the peak and then the fall)
2012
Prime Rate 3.25%
SF Housing Starts 800,000
US Population 314,000,000
Home Ownership Rate 65.3%
In
my opinion, housing did not reset during the recession and the ‘bubble” was
magnified with a “false” market fueling builders to build.
Every
previous recession reset housing prices and families were underwater but it was
not an issue because homes were purchased as a home to raise a family and
become a member of a community. This decade, being underwater meant the loss of
equity and a destroyed investment.
Land
remains plentiful but regulatory policies are taking hold at all levels. Also,
land prices did not reset after 2005 except for those land owners that needed
to sell. Since the mid-90’s, land has become a diminishing resource as a direct
result of government interference and regulation. Since 2008, the real estate
development industry has come to a virtual standstill. Of course development
continues because that is what developers/builders do but at greater risk and
uncertainty.
So,
we do not know as yet the full affect government has had on the industry and
land while the industry strives to survive. And, now the future
2010 –
and beyond – if you have been
following my blog posts over the past two years, land is available and well
located property will sell.
My
guess:
1.
there is an over-supply of “finished” lots in subdivisions which will satisfy
the housing demand in the short term. The need for land to fuel new projects
will be minimal in the short term. Companies without the financial capabilities
or vision will not be in the best position when the economy improves
2.
there are plenty of “approved” housing projects on the shelf but many may lack
updated permits or not be in marketable locations. The regulatory process will
change adding more time from acquisition to being shovel ready.
3.
housing prices will continue to rapidly escalate
4.
building materials and labor shortages will be problematic for the industry
5.
government regulations restricting the use of land have been increasing while
the industry has been striving to survive
6.
inflation is here and will become more of a significant problem forcing an
interest rate dichotomy.
7.
pent up demand exists today
8.
housing demand will escalate as family formations increase and as more jobs are
created
9.
the current lack of supply of existing homes on the market and the lack of new
home construction will further stress the industry
10.
the role of government in real estate development will change as the decade
unfolds
11.
the foreclosure shadow inventory will continue to be problematic for the
industry and affect prices
12.
the Fed has indicated the prime rate will stay low through 2015 --- really!
13.
non-residential projects will still follow roof tops
We
are entering into uncharted territory. However,
the history of the housing industry and the economy gives us a glimpse of what
could occur during the balance of this decade.
Here is my guess:
Here is my guess:
Land
will be further restricted by government
Land
prices will increase
Home
prices will increase
Demand
will increase
Inventory
will remain low
Interest
rates will rise
Material
and labor shortages will hinder the industry
New
home starts will not be able to keep up with the demand
Inflation
will continue to rise
The
economy will improve slightly but still stress all of the above
In
my opinion, as housing goes so goes the economy. Thus, in my opinion, the
future is not so bright in the real estate development industry. This is
opinion is completely contrary to my outlook coming out of the last four
recessions.
However, it is an excellent time to buy real estate; especially land!
However, it is an excellent time to buy real estate; especially land!
Plan
for the worst and pray for the best.
No comments:
Post a Comment