After
past recessions, interest rates had nowhere else to go except down but after
the great recession, interest rates have nowhere else to go except up.
The
Federal Reserve has always been the tail that wags the dog – not so much
anymore. The rise and fall of housing is directly affected by the Federal
Reserve’s actions because they are the puppeteer. Did you know that for over 35 years, the Federal Reserve has been lead by only
three puppeteers?
- Paul A. Volcher 1979 – 1987 (1981 recession)
- Alan Greenspan 1987 – 2006 (1991 & 2001 recessions)
- Ben Bernanke 2006 - 2014 (2008 Great recession)
How would you rate their
performances?
I
remember the 1981 recession very well. You had to buy your home with a credit
card with an interest rate of 18%! We watched the Fed’s action every month to
see if the interest rates would be lowered. We probably refinanced our home three
times during that period of time in which interest rates continue to go down.
What is your interest rate today?
The
1991 recession was triggered by the Savings and Loan failures. All of the toxic
real estate assets were bundled into the newly formed RTC - which worked very
well. This approach should have been the solution to handle the 2008 bust.
Since
1979, we have had six Presidents – three Democrats and three Republicans! We
know everything about the President’s but know very little about the operations
and balance sheet of the Federal Reserve.
The
Federal Reserve has been printing money, more money and more money to trigger economic
growth – now for years………………. Fast forward to today:
Bureau of Economic Analysis: “Real gross domestic product --
the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located
in the United States -- decreased at an annual rate of 2.9 percent in the
first quarter of 2014 according to the "third" estimate released by the
Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the fourth quarter of 2013,
real GDP increased 2.6 percent.”
4th Qt 2013 +2.6%
Change of 5.5% in 3-mo
1St Qt 2014 -2.9%
“Profits from current production (corporate profits with inventory
valuation adjustment (IVA) and capital consumption adjustment (CCAdj))
decreased $198.3 billion in the first quarter, in contrast to an
increase of $47.1 billion in the fourth.”
4th Qt 2013 +$47.1 billion
Change of $245.4 billion in 3-mo
1St Qt 2014 -$198.3 billion
So
if the puppeteers are not having success with dramatic mood swings in the
economy, what do you expect will happen to interest rates which are already at
historic lows AND housing is not responding!
Do
you really think the Fed can manage a gradual increase in inflation by
adjusting interest rates slowly? The Fed is between the sword and the wall? It
will not end well.
Increasing
inflationary pressures and having higher interest rates will not make us feel
better nor cause us to have greater confidence in the economy. It is time to
change economic course before it is too late. We can handle the truth but
manipulating the truth for gain has us disconnected and disengaged.
1970’s
2-income families increased about
20% since 1970. 50% of that increase occurred during the 1970’s. The balance of
the shift occurred over the next 30-years.
It is the second earner that will allow buyers to buy a home …….but what
happens if they choose not to buy?
The change in the family to a
2-income family caused the median price of homes to skyrocket. In the ‘70’s,
the move-up market was created! The second income added over 30% to the
available income to be qualified for a home mortgage. The housing market shifted over night as
builders built homes to meet the demand primarily driven by available family
income – the market changed!
What do you think the result would
be of a Fed action that would cause interest rates to increase above 6%? We do
know that everything will cost more including our national debt.
1970 - 1979 2010-2012 2014
Prime Rate 12% 3.25% 3.25%
SF Housing Starts 888,100 800,000 900,000
US Population 213,300,000 314,000,000 317,600,000
Home Ownership Rate 64.4% 65.3% 64.8%
Participation Rate 61% 64.0% 63.0%
Please tell me that you see the
stark differences between 1970 and 2012
But also see the deep concern in the
differences compared to 2014.
This is not going to end well for
the housing industry.
Interest rates over the past four decades+ have always had an
impact on the everyday consumer. Unfortunately, Millenials have not experienced
the effects of higher interest rates.
1980’s
Internet
Source: “In 1982, the Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act was passed,
which allowed S&Ls to raise interest rates on deposits, make commercial and
consumer loans, and removed restrictions on loan-to-value ratios. At the same
time, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board regulatory staff was reduced thanks to
budget cuts.
The
Garn-St. Germain Act -- which freed S&Ls to make risky loans, eliminate
deposit caps, and hold less capital. S&Ls used their new freedom to pay
higher rates to depositors and invested those new deposits in commercial
real estate projects and junk bonds.”
In
part, this led to the recession(s) of the ‘80’s.
2000’s
Lenders
who ultimately lent funds to people with poor credit and a high risk of default
were the cause of the great recession and they ruined families as they went.
A
subprime mortgage is a type of loan granted to individuals with poor credit
histories (below 600), who, as a result of their bad credit ratings, would not
be able to qualify for conventional mortgages. Because subprime borrowers are a
higher risk for lenders, the lenders offered subprime mortgages with interest
rates above the prime lending rate. Why is this any different than a “loan
shark”?
2010’s
1970 2010 Jan 2014 My Nov 2016 Estimate
Annual
Average 5.03% 4.69% 4.40% 6%
Interest
Rates
Income $7,494 $47,425 $52,000 $55,000
Price
of Home that can
be
purchased with $33,500 $218,000 $244,500 $205,000*
income*
Median
Price of $23,400 $221,800 $270,200 $280,000
a
Home in US
*This
price includes a minimum down payment but doesn’t account for PMI costs. PMI is
now charged to the borrower over the life of the loan! Also, a borrower would
need over $50,000 for a minimal down payment and cover closing costs.
For
historical context during previous recessions, the following are annual
interest rate averages:
4-years
later
1974 9.19% 9.0%
1981 16.63% 13.1%
1989 10.32% 8.0%
2000 8.05% 5.7%
2008 6.00% 3.9%
Housing – Next Phase
As
the population increases the sheer number of people not owning a home or active
in the workforce increases even if the homeownership and participation rates
stay the same. The sheer number of people that are not working is the problem
and will be THE problem for decades. The pent-up demand is extraordinary even
with historically low interest rates.
The
Federal Reserve is expected to control the pace interest rates increase before reaching
a new economic norm. It will take a herculean effort to manage the rate of
inflation and dodge another recession by 2016.
Housing
will be on the sidelines until there is a defined economic path recognizable by
the first time homebuyer.
Next week…………………….
Next week…………………….
“The
Key to Our Economic Recovery is in the Hands and Minds of Millennials”