Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Home Prices are Rising as Fast as our National Debt - Really!



You should be checking your local housing market to assess how high home prices have increased since the beginning of the year. For our local area in North Carolina, price has increased:

Median Price is up 10.1%

Average Price is up 11.5%

The Lack of listing inventory plus stronger buyer demand is the main component that is driving this price gain, but appraisals are very tricky in a market that has rising prices..

Monthly supply of homes for sale in the Charlotte region is bouncing between 5 and 6 months.
 
 
 
 
 
This graph was published by the National Association of Realtors and represents the national inventory level of homes listed for sale.
 
Please offer an explaination as to why homeowners are NOT listing their homes for sale.
 
 
 
            Over the past 4 to 5 months shows 80 days on average to get a listing sold (days on the market). This figure is significant because it also tells me that there are qualified buyers in the market and the rise in interest rates have again made buyers decide that now is the time to buy.
 
 

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

College Graduates & Real Estate- a case to be made today



The average starting salary for a bachelor's degree graduate stands at $44,259, according to the September 2012 issue of Salary Survey, published by the National Association of Colleges and Employers

2012 U.S. household consumer debt profile:

  • Average student loan debt: $34,703

The unemployment and underemployment rates are astounding for college graduates. 

In fall 2012, a record 21.6 million students were expected to attend American colleges and universities.

Not a perfect analysis but let’s say that the 21.6 million students are split evenly from 2008 - 2012. Thus, approximately 5,400,000 students are ready to graduate each year. On the average, about 56% of those students graduate. NOTE: my estimation on the low side.

The number of graduating students per year would be 3,024,000.

On the average since 2008, the student unemployment rate is around 8%.

(2,782,080 students graduate over the past 4 years = 11,128,320) – that found a job!!

About 5,000,000 jobs were created over the past 4-years for the 11,000,000 new  graduates that found a job and they were in competition with unemployed workers with experience for these jobs!

NOTE: by the way, I don’t believe new college graduates that are included in the 8% that can’t find a job are NOT added to the unemployment rate – they never had a job!
 
 

If you are in your 20’s, the possibility of taking advantage of low interest rates to buy a home is a fleeting opportunity due to college debt, low starting salary or NO job.

In my opinion, graduates that were lucky enough to find employment over the past 4-yrs need to strive and buy a home sooner than later. Why? 

A home is a hedge against inflation,

Provides a savings account opportunity

Your home will appreciate in price over time

You will not be subject to rent increases.

However, the starter home will not be purchased by first time homebuyers but by those previous buyers that went through foreclosure and short sales. This only makes starter homes even more difficult to find.

I think most college graduates will consider buying a home as a commitment and unattainable goal. Both of which will not be considered a positive by them but should be by their families. And the situation will not get any better for them in the short term and perhaps even longer as there is NO light at the end of the tunnel – only more darkness.

If you know a recent grad and they have a job, you should advise them to purchase a home. The problem is the down payment and not the ability to pay a mortgage. After all, the mortgage payment will be less than their apartment but for not much longer.

Interest rates have already ticked up significantly and I am not sure they will stop.

The Fed can’t afford to stop using their credit card and they can’t afford to continue to use their credit card – a NO WIN situation!
 
 
 

Monday, October 7, 2013

The 1970’s Changed our Culture, Economy, and Family


The 1970’s was a dramatic decade of change transitioning every aspect of our lives. We of course didn’t realize the shifts or nudges or 2 x 4’s immediately but most seems very apparent today.  

Since starting my blog in 2008, I have been saying that “As housing goes….so goes the economy”. This has been the pattern coming out of every recession since the first one that I experienced in early 1970. Not so much anymore. I will try to present my views on how the 1970’s has affected housing and how housing will not be the answer to our economic woes.

The framework in which to review how we have changed as a country, we must first review the national policies and personal failures of our leaders. Our view of the federal government changed in the ‘70’s and has been going downhill ever since. The problem, we continued to send the same politicians to do the same job over and over again but expect different results………………..we are insane!

Any way, we have to start with Richard Nixon.

Nixon's second term saw a crisis in the Middle East, resulting in an oil embargo and the restart of the Middle East peace process, as well as a continuing series of revelations about the Watergate scandal. The scandal escalated, costing Nixon much of his political support, and on August 9, 1974, he resigned in the face of almost certain impeachment and removal from office. Source: From Wikipedia

 
Our trust disappeared in our leaders starting with Richard Nixon and then entered Carter which did not change our opinion. The stagflation era (could we be heading in this direction ---now?) under the Carter Administration stressed the foundation of the family – financial. To buy a house, your interest rate was well over 15% and the only way to afford a home was to have 2-income earners.  (Source of quotes is unknown) 
 

"One important adaptation to the rising cost of housing is found in the increasing appearance of two-earner households... The second income provided more than 30% of total household income "

"First time buying households were even more dependent on a second income... It seems clear that the second income was made it possible to accommodate rising housing costs as a higher proportion of the total household income. Thus the growing importance of the second earner is a major factor in the continued affordability of home ownership”
 

2-income families have increased about 20% since 1970. 50% of that increase occurred during the 1970’s. The balance of the shift occurred over the next 30-years.  
 
 

In a previous blog post, I outlined the median price of homes changes by decade. Do you know that the median price of a home in 1970 was $23,400!

In 1980, the median price of a home in the US was $169,000.

What is your opinion on why such a significant jump?
 
I never realized that there was this significant jump in housing prices and to never be reset but at a higher price.  Yes, inflation did have a part in the increase but that was dampened by how much 2-income families could afford to buy when mortgage interest rates were around 18%.

Can you imagine if the Fed today would raise interest rates to 6% …… we would go into a depression!

The change in the family to a 2-income family caused the median price of homes to skyrocket. In the ‘70’s, the move-up market was created! The second income added over 30% to the available income to be qualified for a home mortgage.  The housing market shifted over night as builders built homes to meet the demand primarily driven by available family income – the market changed!
 

1970 - 1979                                         2010-2019      
 

Prime Rate                                          12%                                                     3.25%

SF Housing Starts                               888,100                                               800,000

US Population                                     213,300,000                                        314,000,000

Home Ownership Rate                       64.4%                                                  65.3%

 
Result                                                  Stagflation                                          Hyper Inflation

Please tell me that you see the stark differences between 1970 and 2012 but also see the deep concern in the differences. This is not going to end well for the housing industry.

Little did we know that the 70’s would change us forever!

Live: started to live further out from urban cores; “nice but not necessary” not practiced; today, vertical mixed use developments are the modern small town America

Work: Mom’s and Dad’s started to both work; today over 50% of mothers and over 50% single parents with preschool children are employed outside the home; hand held calculators in the 70’s to iPads now

Shop: Walmart went national in the 70’s; the JC Penny catalog, Woolworths to internet shopping

Play: HBO was founded in 1972 and ESPN in 1979. Today, technology overload.

This was reinforced by what we watched – pre- personal computers! As an example:

            “The Mary Tyler Moore Show VIEW SHOW The Mary Tyler Moore Show is an American    television sitcom created by James L. Brooks and Allan Burns that aired on CBS from 1970 to 1977. The program was a television breakthrough, with the first never-married, independent career woman as the central character: "As Mary Richards, a single woman in her thirties, Moore presented a character different from other single TV women of the time. She was not widowed or divorced or seeking a man to support her.”

 
 
Fast forward to 2013, do you think the family core has changed for the better or worse?
 

 

In the 1970’s, we started to see manufacturing jobs disappear and shipped off to other countries.. The best that I can research as to why includes:

1. Oil and energy problems

2. The dollar was taken off the gold standard


 
OK, this makes some sense but how was housing affected by the above or were there additional circumstances that changed us as home buyers --- besides 18% interest rates and 2-income families?

Yes…………sewer and the EPA!

Sewer moratoriums with the Clean Water act of 1972 limited the Supply of Land

During the ‘70’s there was no problem finding land in urban, rural or suburban locations at reasonable prices and with reasonable land owners because government oversight was only beginning. However, the supply was curtailed not only by interest rates, inflation, but also SEWER availability!

Reston, Columbia and Irvine Ranch started the planned community concept by moving homeowners to the suburbs and leaving the core commercial/retail/office jobs in the city.

During the 70’s, the biggest problem was sewage treatment plants and the moratoriums established by government until the Clean Water Act amendments passed.

The most important due diligence issue was the availability of public water and sewer.

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1948 was the first major U.S. law to address water pollution. Growing public awareness and concern for controlling water pollution led to sweeping amendments in 1972. As amended in 1972, the law became commonly known as the Clean Water Act (CWA).

The 1972 amendments included:

Established the basic structure for regulating pollutants discharges into the waters of the United States.

Gave EPA the authority to implement pollution control programs such as setting wastewater standards for industry.
 
Maintained existing requirements to set water quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters.

Made it unlawful for any person to discharge any pollutant from a point source into navigable waters, unless a permit was obtained under its provisions.

Funded the construction of sewage treatment plants under the construction grants program.

Recognized the need for planning to address the critical problems posed by nonpoint source pollution.

Local municipalities imposed sewer moratoriums because their wastewater treatment plants were not in compliance with the new federal regulations. This stopped housing in its tracks. Land availability dried up because of the lack of public sewer facilities. With housing supply restricted, prices continued to escalate because 2-income earning families created a false market which builders capitalized on. The economy and housing moved forward but at a very, very slow pace.

“Similarly, many of the wastewater treatment plants that were upgraded in the 1970s to comply with the Clean Water Act are aging and will need to be upgraded or replaced in the future.
            Source Unknown

I do know that wastewater treatment plants are nearing capacity with actual flow or allocated flow. Local municipalities strapped for revenue will have enough funds for general maintenance but little allocated for expansion of water and sewer treatment facilities.

Builders are still working off the subdivisions that failed during the bubble. Many of these subdivisions had water and sewer lines installed and capacity allocated. Once this inventory is sold to home buyers…………………….what then?? MORATORIUM!

This simply means NO building? Planning…..what planning – how can you plan when you are in survival mode?

The EPA is relentless by imposing new regulations while the entire country is focused on other things. And, this is an agency which sent 93% of the workforce home because they were considered non-essential during this government shutdown.

Wastewater treatment will again be the achilles heel of the housing industry and the economy.

In summary, the 1970’s changed are economy benchmark so significantly, we are only now realizing the effect. High interest rates, stagflation, 2-income families, and wastewater treatment plant moratoriums with Federal pollution controls add up to serious consequences in 2014 and beyond.