If a Federal government agency
issues a rule extending their regulatory reach, what can we do?
EPA issues a 370 page rule changing
the definition of “Waters of the United States”. Here we go again.
We can comment on the rule during
the public comment period but generally, individual comments have little to no
effect on the outcome.
Terms used in the new rule on what
are “waters of the United States”
“regulated public”
“other waters”
“significant nexus”
Please know that the EPA issued a
370 page rule to redefine what “waters” are considered “waters of the United States” even if they
would otherwise be included within the categories in (a)(1) through (a)(7)
above. They are:
Page 45 of 370
Prior converted cropland.
Notwithstanding the determination of an area’s status as prior converted
cropland by any other federal agency, for the purposes of the Clean Water Act
the final authority regarding Clean Water Act jurisdiction remains with EPA.
Ditches that are excavated wholly in
uplands, drain only uplands and have less than perennial flow.
Ditches that do not contribute flow,
either directly or through another water, to a traditional navigable water,
interstate water, the territorial seas or jurisdictional impoundment
Artificially irrigated areas that
would revert to upland should application of irrigation water to that area
cease;
Artificial lakes or ponds created by
excavating and/or diking dry land and used exclusively for such purposes as
stock watering, irrigation, settling basins, or rice growing;
Artificial reflecting pools or
swimming pools created by excavating and/or diking dry land;
Small ornamental waters created by
excavating and/or diking dry land for primarily aesthetic reasons;
Water filled depressions created incidental to construction
activity; (Wow are we ever lucky! But what happens when you wash your
car and create a puddle?)
Groundwater, including groundwater drained
through subsurface drainage systems;
Gullies and rills and non-wetland
swales
Basically, everything else will be
“waters of the United States”. If you don’t think this is a significant
intrusion into private property rights, then relax and watch your sitcoms.
We continue to be over regulated and
told how to live on our own property. And it will only get worse!
No comments:
Post a Comment